Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Special Senate Committee Weighing On Bringing In The “Ukraine Whistleblower” After Trump Gets Fully Acquitted Of Impeachment

Senate Intelligence Committee weighing ‘Ukraine whistleblower’ testimony now that impeachment is done

Republicans allege that the whistleblower had contact with Rep. Adam Schiff before lodging his complaint..

By Jon Dougherty

(TNS) Now that the Senate has acquitted President Trump of a pair of bogus impeachment articles, the Republican chairman of the Intelligence Committee believes it’s time to bring in the person who got that ball rolling in the first place: The ‘Ukraine whistleblower.’

Like a character from the Harry Potter series, ‘he who shall not be named’ has yet to officially be identified, though most everyone paying attention to impeachment over the past several months is aware that it is very like CIA employee **** **********.

take our poll - story continues below

Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?(2)

  • Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Right Wing Tribune updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

But identifying him isn’t as important to the head of the committee as is hearing what led to his complaint in the first place and what happened afterward.

The Hill reports:

The probe will force senators to decide if, and how, they speak with the whistleblower — a controversial call that could test the bipartisan reputation the Intelligence panel has maintained even amid deeply partisan fights in Congress. 

Asked by The Hill if he was willing to formally compel and subpoena the whistleblower to testify, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) didn’t rule out the possibility.

Trending: BREAKING: Hundreds Charged Worldwide In Takedown Of Largest Child Pornography Website

“I think you can rest assured that I’m prepared to do whatever we have to to interview the whistleblower,” Burr said. 

The renewed interest in speaking with the whistleblower comes after committee staff and lawyers for the individual hit a stalemate late last year over potential questioning.

Lawyers for the individual made offers at the time to both the House and Senate Intelligence committees that their client was willing to provide written answers under oath, but Burr rejected that offer. 

The North Carolina senator indicated no progress had been made since then in trying to reach a deal on testimony, and that while he hadn’t spoken recently with Mark Zaid, one of the whistleblower’s lawyers, that his plan is “an interview with committee staff.” 

One senator who appears to be extremely eager to hear from the whistleblower is Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), though he’s not a member of the Intelligence Committee.

“The Senate Intel Committee under Richard Burr has told us that we will call the whistleblower,” Graham, who chairs the Judiciary Committee, said earlier this month during a Fox News interview.

He added in a subsequent interview with CBS’s “Face the Nation” that the “whistleblower episode needs to be investigated by Richard Burr” and in an interview with Fox News Radio that “the Intel Committee should be looking at whether or not the whistleblower had a bias.”

Reports suggest that he has.

For one, Republicans allege that the whistleblower had contact with Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and his staff prior to lodging his ‘complaint’ which, by the way, was pretty much debunked after the White House unexpectedly released the transcript of the phone call in question between Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky.

They also believe that Schiff has so far refused to release the secret testimony from Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson because it will prove that the whistleblower colluded with Schiff’s office.

Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), a member of the Intelligence Committee and GOP leadership, said that he would support subpoenaing the whistleblower if Burr takes that path.

“I’d be supportive of whatever it takes, including a subpoena,” Blunt told The Hill, adding that he also thought the committee “would probably be willing to do this in any reasonable way that the whistleblower would be willing to come forward.”

This article originally appeared at The National Sentinel and was republished with permission.

Join us at SPREELY if you want REAL NEWS without the leftist censorship!

Dean James at Right Wing Tribune

God Bless.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you, we appreciate it!

Facebook Has Banned Us!

The leftists at Facebook decided they didn't like our message, so they removed our page and are censoring us. Help us fight back and subscribe to our newsletter so that you can stay up-to-date with everything Facebook doesn't want you to see!

YOU MIGHT LIKE
0SHARES[mashshare]
Follow Me On Twitter!