Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman Refuses to Say Who He Spoke to in Intelligence Community About July 25 Call”


#UPDATE- “We have made corrections and retracted opinion that was deemed false to the original article to present just the facts. We deeply apologize for the original misleading information.”

By HJIC at Illicit Info OPINION Blog

Opinion| Lawrence David|

Here’s Rep. Nunes asking Vindman, who admitted to sharing the contents of President Trump and Ukraine President Zelensky’s phone call with two people, who they were:

Nunes: What agencies were these officials with?

Lt. Col. Vindman: Department of State, Deputy Assistant Secretary George Kent… and an individual from the office in the intelligence community.

Nunes: As you know the intelligence community has 17 different agencies.  What agency was this individual from?

Chairman Schiff: If I can interject here.  We don’t want to use these proceedings (crosstalk) we need to protect the whistleblower.  I want to make sure that there’s no effort to out the whistleblower through these proceedings.

If the witness has a good faith belief that this may reveal the identity of the whistleblower, that is not the purpose of what we are here for and I want to advise the witness accordingly.


Nunes: Lt. Col. Vindman, you testified in your deposition that you did not know who the whistleblower was.

Lt. Col. Vindman: I do not know who the whistleblower is.

Nunes: How is it possible for you to name these people and then out the whistleblower?

Lt. Col. VindmanPer the advice of my counsel I’ve been advised not to answer specific questions about members of the intelligence community.

Nunes: Are you aware that this is the Intelligence Committee that’s conducting an impeachment hearing?

Lt. Col. Vindman: Of course I am.

Nunes: Wouldn’t the appropriate place for you to have come to to testify would be the Intelligence Committee about someone within the intelligence community?

Lt. Col. VindmanRanking member, per the advice of my counsel, and the instructions from the Chairman, I’ve been advised not to provide any specifics on who I’ve spoken to within the intelligence community. 

Only in the minds of Democrats can second-hand allegations from an anonymous source be considered grounds for overturning the votes of 63,000,000 Americans.

Shut these hearings down until the complainant (whistleblower) can be cross examined.

Portions of this article originally appeared at Illicit Info OPINION Blog and was republished with permission.

We have made necessary edits.

Scroll down to leave a comment!

Join us at SPREELY if you want REAL NEWS without the leftist censorship!

Dean James at Right Wing Tribune

God Bless.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you, we appreciate it!

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments