Pelosi And Dems’ Desperation to Turn Attention Away From Crowdstrike- Forced Into Impeachment Vote By House Minority Leader [OPINION]

By HJIC at Illicit Info Opinion Blog

OP ED From E.P. – (This Article Is Sharing The Opinion Of An Individual, Not 100% Established Facts)

Once Americans elected Donald Trump to be a disruptor it was only a matter of time until impeachment would be the swamp’s last resort.

Keep in mind that both the Republican and Democratic Parties are private corporations looking out for their own interests, not yours, at least that’s how I’ve come to see it.  Donald Trump, by representing your interests above everything else, threatened their interests.

It appeared that the UniParty early on decided it could not allow this president to be successful in implementing his America First trade agenda.

The alleged weaponization of U.S. intelligence services, specifically against Donald Trump, reportedly began as early as 2015.  That’s how determined the Obama administration was to derail the possibility of a Trump presidency.

Now, with the Trump administration’s Justice Department readying the release of Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s and U.S Attorney John Durham’s reports, Democrats have seemingly become increasingly desperate to provide fodder to their media allies that would allow them to focus our attention elsewhere, other than the crimes we are convinced they have committed.

Yesterday, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy called Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s bluff and essentially demanded a vote by the full chamber to put every Democrat on record.  Left with no choice, 231 Dems (every Dem who voted) voted to impeach our POTUS.

The president’s phone call with the Ukrainian president became the predicate to again twist the facts and begin a new narrative that Trump broke a law, some law, somewhere.

Judge for yourself.  Here’s the “no there, there” notes of President Trump’s telephone conversation with Ukraine’s President Zelenskyy were declassified below.


From where I sit, it seems that the Democrats concerns were triggered by the president’s reference to Crowdstrike.  I doubt that they care about Biden or his son. I would lay odds that it was long ago that they realized Biden was incapable of running a successful campaign.

But the Biden reference offers a great distraction from Trump’s ask about help with Crowdstrike.

To refresh your memory, Crowdstrike is the private security firm that the DNC hired to verify claims that their server(s) had been hacked by Russia.  The entire Trump-Russia collusion narrative collapses if Russia wasn’t responsible for the hack.

But, in January of 2017, before Donald Trump had even assumed the office of the presidency, questions arose over how it could be that the FBI reportedly never examined the DNC server for itself, especially considering who the target of their investigation was?

Regardless of the reason, the F.B.I. made a conscious decision to rely on the findings of a private security firm, Crowdstrike.

This was consistent with the, in my opinion, shameful non-investigation that the F.B.I. reportedly conducted on Hillary Clinton’s email server where they seemingly gave her attorneys the opportunity to erase tens of thousands of emails before handing over the emails.

A look at Crowdstrike’s executive list names Moscow-born Dmitri Alperovitch as its Chief Technology Officer.  Wherever Aperovitch’s allegiance may lie, it’s fair to ask WTF is a private security firm doing the work that America’s “vaunted” intelligence community is supposedly in place to do?

Five months later, in June of 2017, Obama’s former DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson read a prepared statement to the House Intelligence Committee:

“Sometime in 2016 I became aware of a hack into systems of the Democratic National Committee. Fresh from the experience with the Office of Personnel Management, I pressed my staff to know whether DHS was sufficiently proactive, and on the scene helping the DNC identify the intruders and patch vulnerabilities. The answer, to the best of my recollection, was not reassuring: the FBI and the DNC had been in contact with each other months before about the intrusion, and the DNC did not feel it needed DHS’s assistance at that time.”

At that time, Trey Gowdy questioned what could’ve motivated these experienced prosecutors to mishandle a server containing potentially significant evidence:

GOWDYLet me hazard a wild guess. There may be something else on that server they didn’t want law enforcement to see? That is where you start. I don’t like speculating, but I have dealt in the past with victims that would not cooperate with investigations. Typically, the reason is, there is something else you don’t want law enforcement to see. There is no reason to not allow DHS to patch or fix a vulnerability in the DNC system. Heaven knows there is no reason to not give the world’s premier law enforcement agency, which is the FBI, the evidence they may need to stop another attack from hurting someone else.

Could those reasons including hiding the violations of federal laws governing voter fraud, perhaps incorporate the allegations surrounding Seth Rich’s death, transference of Top-Secret files to official state enemies, and cooperation with the Russians to provide them access into our voting systems, that would’ve been exposed by a thorough forensic investigation?  Perhaps we will never know, but if there was no “there, there” you would think they could present the evidence and prove that’s the case

Seems to be that not only does the need to hide that criminal effort to pervert the 2016 election provide Democrats provide every incentive to remove this president through impeachment, but by initiating impeachment, Democrats and UniParty co-conspirator Republicans in the Senate, have an excuse to ignore their legislative responsibilities.

As a result of the impeachment proceeding, USMCA is dead.  As well, negotiations with China are essentially neutered.

As far as I can tell, by far, the biggest beneficiary of this is the communist Chinese who are hemorrhaging cash in the face of Trump’s tariffs.  Worse, there’s no sunlight for China on the other side of their negotiations with the Trump administration.

China has one hope to avert Trump’s globalist realignment.  That is through the removal or electoral defeat of President Trump.

Not surprisingly, Democrats have begun the process of removing Donald Trump.  It would be smart not to trust all Republicans to defend the president. They too have much to lose.

“Our movement is about replacing a failed and corrupt political establishment with a new government controlled by you, the American people.

“The washington establishment, and the financial and media corporations that fund it, exists for only one reason, to protect and enrich itself.

“The establishment has trillions of dollars at stake…”

In 2016, Jerrold Nadler acknowledged the threat before Trump even took office.

There’s trillions of dollars at stake and almost all of that money belongs to you.

This op-ed originally appeared at Illicit Info Opinion Blog and was republished with permission.

Join us at SPREELY if you want REAL NEWS without the leftist censorship!

Dean James at Right Wing Tribune

God Bless.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you, we appreciate it!

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments