Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Ingraham Risked It All To Warn America Of Mueller’s Hidden Ethics Trouble, Along With Jeannie Rhee, Andrew Weissmann & More Last Night

1,696SHARES

OPINION

Posted by Dean James at Right Wing Tribune

Ingraham: After Mueller testimony ‘disaster,’ we MUST hold accountable those who perpetuated the ‘Spygate’ hoax (Video)

By HJIC at Illicit Info

Trending: Lewandowski Brings Up Hillary’s Deleted Emails During Impeachment Hearing And Room Explodes

Opinion & Speculation From Elder Patriot  – Laura Ingraham was on fire last night.  She hammered the mere reason behind the appointment of a special counsel, as well as Robert Mueller himself for ethics violations. (Video at bottom of article)

“How was a man who was obviously so detached from key aspects of the case ever allowed to run the investigation,” Ingraham — a former attorney asked.

“Why didn’t they end the investigation when they realized there no collusion [with Russia] or conspiracy to throw the [2016] election?” she continued.

Ingraham probably knows the answer to those questions but as a constitutional attorney (she clerked under Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas) she was taught to ask probative questions and then let the answers tell the story.

Those answers will almost certainly tell us that Robert Mueller didn’t choose the members of the special counsel team.  In all likelihood, and following that dreadful performance before Congress, on Wednesday, the team chose him.

Mueller was the perfect candidate for the corrupt team of special counsel investigators to choose to be their titular leader.  He was first appointed U.S. attorney by Ronald Reagan and remained a registered Republican.

The SC team could establish political credibility using Mueller’s party affiliation and, in fact, that was repeated ad nauseam by the leftist anarchists defending the team’s work.

More importantly, his diminished mental capacity would allow him to be shielded from key evidence – he apparently was unaware of Fusion GPS – and manipulated more easily.

Ingraham was also taken aback by the fact that, during questioning, Mueller appeared to not know anything about a key firm involved in the case — Fusion GPS, which commissioned the infamous “Steele Dossier,” paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC, and which the FBI relied on (knowing it was bogus) to obtain FISA court surveillance warrants for a member of the Trump campaign (Carter Page).

“Why wasn’t the FISA court fully informed about the origins of the dossier?” she noted further. “How did Trump-hating partisans manage to become key players on Mueller’s team?”

And this: “Why do elites always seem to get away with the abuse of power when conservatives, like Trump, are dragged through for something he didn’t even do?”

This is not a right-wing conspiracy theory.  Listen to Obama’s former Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper:

I digress.  Back to Ingraham’s comments:

“…Yesterday we were reminded that the American taxpayers spent $34 million for an investigation that could have been easily handled by the regular line prosecutors at the Justice Department…”

In fact, Andrew Weissman, who served as Mueller’s “pitbull” was a line prosecutor who had been part of the DOJ sham investigation of candidate then President Donald Trump.

Apparently, Mueller didn’t know anything about Weissmann or his ties to Hillary Clinton.  Or, about Jeannie Rhee’s, another member of the SC team, previous legal work for Hillary Clinton.

Rhee is also a leftist activist that further clouds her credibility in conducting a fair and impartial investigation of Donald Trump.

“…Why was this team allowed to operate outside the code of Professional Responsibility that all US attorneys are subject to?…”

Former U.S. attorney Joe di Genova and former Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jon Yoo joined the discussion at this time.

Di Genova pointed out Weissman and Rhee had clear conflicts of interest.

Yoo:  “As a former Justice Department official, as Joe was, you’re supposed to take it upon yourself to ask yourself; can I be impartial?  

“It’s not even whether I can be impartial, it’s also would anyone knowing about my work say, from my past clients, or my personal friends, or political contacts, would anyone outside question the impartiality of the Justice Department if I participated?… 

… A good attorney will do it themselves.”  

WATCH- ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW:

She noted that under attorney ethics rules, the Hillary Clinton-linked attorneys on Mueller’s staff had an obligation to recuse themselves from the case, but of course, they didn’t. And during his testimony, Mueller made clear he didn’t vet anyone before hiring them.

“My friends, Republicans must hold them accountable and get real answers as to why this team was allowed to operate outside the code of professional responsibility that all of us attorneys are subject to,” Ingraham said.

Additional source – JonDougherty at The National Sentinel

Join us at SPREELY if you want REAL NEWS without the leftist censorship!

Dean James at Right Wing Tribune

God Bless.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you, we appreciate it!

Facebook Has Banned Us!

The leftists at Facebook decided they didn't like our message, so they removed our page and are censoring us. Help us fight back and subscribe to our newsletter so that you can stay up-to-date with everything Facebook doesn't want you to see!

1,696SHARES
YOU MIGHT LIKE